Lesson Shuffle: Shuffle, Pick, Grow
Instructional DeliveryCard B1

Concept Clash

How is X like Y?

3–5 minNo prepModerate

The move

Students explain how today’s concept is like a strange, everyday object, and defend the comparison.

See how it works

SimilePaperclipBoth connecttwo thingsBoth aresmall toolsWhere itbreaks?
The comparison only works if students can say what the two share, and where it breaks.

At a glance

Time in class
3–5 minutes
Prep
None. Pick one odd object to compare with today’s concept (2 minutes in your head).
Materials
None
Grouping
Pairs, then whole class
Use it when
Right after you introduce a new term or idea

Why it works

To compare two things, students have to pull out the deep structure of the concept, not just repeat its definition. Comparing ideas this way (analogy) is one of the main ways people understand something new in terms of something they already know.

Step by step

In class: about 3–6 min

  1. 1Pose the clash30 seconds
  2. 2Think time30 seconds
  3. 3Pair up1–2 minutes
  4. 4Share out1–2 minutes
  5. 5Close15 seconds
  1. Pose the clash30 secondsName the concept and an unrelated object.“How is a simile like a paperclip? Think on your own first.”
  2. Think time30 secondsSilent thinking. Students may jot a few words.
  3. Pair up1–2 minutes“Tell your partner one way they’re alike, and why. Your partner has to agree or push back.”
  4. Share out1–2 minutesTake three answers. After each, ask the class: “Does that comparison hold up? Where does it break?”
  5. Close15 seconds“So the big idea of a simile is that it connects two things. That’s what we’ll use today.”

See it in action

How is a noun like a backpack? (Both hold something: a person, place or thing.)

Watch out for

Level up

Make it work for everyone

Tech option

Put the object’s picture on a slide. Collect answers on a shared board or poll if you want a record.

Resources

Reflect

Which comparison revealed a misunderstanding you would have missed with a definition question?

Evidence

Moderate

Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. Shows that analogies help people understand new ideas by mapping relationships from something familiar.

Find the research: Gentner (1983)